![best ssd for macbook pro 2009 best ssd for macbook pro 2009](https://cdn.thewirecutter.com/wp-content/media/2021/02/ssd-2048px-0101-2x1-1.jpg)
- #BEST SSD FOR MACBOOK PRO 2009 SERIES#
- #BEST SSD FOR MACBOOK PRO 2009 MAC#
- #BEST SSD FOR MACBOOK PRO 2009 WINDOWS#
On each machine I opened three Safari windows and pointed them at the first page in the sequence. Each page is designed to forward to the next after 10 seconds and the loop continues indefinitely. I then scoured the web for big, animated Flash ads and added anywhere from 1 - 4 ads per page all Flash. I strung together 8 reviews on AnandTech and put them each on a single page, images and all. While constantly loading web pages will ensure the CPU can't go into deep sleep, Flash on the pages would make sure that the CPU utilization remains higher at all times. The key flaw in my initial wireless web browsing test is that it none of web pages have any Flash on them. I threw together another test just to make sure. The notebook is just playing music and surfing through a lot of my old reviews. That's with the screen at half brightness (completely usable) and no funny optimizations. In my lightest test, the new 15-inch MacBook Pro lasted eight hours and eight minutes. This is an extremely light test as none of the web pages have any flash ads, but it’s a valid test of very light wireless usage.Įight, freakin, hours. The test continues to loop all while playing MP3s in iTunes.
#BEST SSD FOR MACBOOK PRO 2009 SERIES#
The wireless web browsing test uses the 802.11n connection to browse a series of 20 web pages varying in size, spending 20 seconds on each page (I timed how long it takes me to read a page on Digg and came up with 36 seconds I standardized on 20 seconds for the test to make things a little more stressful).
![best ssd for macbook pro 2009 best ssd for macbook pro 2009](https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usedphotosna/46815425_614.jpg)
First up was my wireless web browsing test:
#BEST SSD FOR MACBOOK PRO 2009 MAC#
So it got solved in the end, but it wasn’t quite the blissful experience I expected.To find out how well the new lithium polymer battery does I ran my usual suite of Mac battery life tests. Once that was done I dragged my apps and data from the old drive across to the new drive. So finally I bit the bullet and re-installed Snow Leopard (the most recent media I had), upgraded to Lion, then Mountain Lion through the App Store. I could always replace the old drive, but I was starting to think I might have wasted my money. That would have been fine for a Time Machine backup, since the old drive was not completely full, but for an image restore it’s a big no-no. That would have been fine, except the new hard drive was fractionally smaller than the old one. I connected my old hard drive using a USB cable, booted from the CD and used the Disk Utility to restore the old hard drive to the new SSD. It turns out my Time Machine backups weren’t as complete as I thought. I use Time Machine for backups, so I slapped in the new hard drive, booted from the CD and expected to just restore from Time Machine.
![best ssd for macbook pro 2009 best ssd for macbook pro 2009](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/jd3RS-GGsCI/maxresdefault.jpg)
The transfer of the data proved a little more tricky than I expected though… The actual hard drive replacement is pretty simple. It arrived yesterday, so during last nights insomnia, I decided to fit the hard drive, rather than stare at the ceiling. Despite this, I was bored the other night and decided to buy an SSD to replace the internal hard drive. I do demos with a couple of Linux VMs running Oracle and it works OK. A few years ago I upgraded from 4G to 8G RAM, so I’m not stranger to taking the back off it.Įven though it’s quite old by computer geek standards, I really don’t have any performance problems. Apart from one brief visit to Apple to replace a noisy fan, I’ve had no worries. I’ve had my 13″ MacBook Pro since the mid 2009 refresh and it’s been really reliable.